comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: hist

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: hist_nd question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: hist_nd question [message #52935 is a reply to message #52934]

Mon, 05 March 2007 07:42

Wox
Messages: 184
Registered: August 2006

Senior Member

Ok, it's not so simple. The problem is it can fall outside the
boundries for 1 dimension (-1 or nbins[i] ) and inside for others.
Since the result is summed to h, expanding the boundries with 1 will
not work. Any idea how to do this without using a where in the for
loop?

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:17:09 +0100, Wox <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

> The fix is simple: change two lines.
>
> h=(nbins[s[0]-1]-1)<long((V[s[0]-1,*]-mn[s[0]-1])/bs[s[0]-1]) >0L
> =>
> h=nbins[s[0]-1]<long((V[s[0]-1,*]-mn[s[0]-1])/bs[s[0]-1])>-1L
>
> h=nbins[i]*h+((nbins[i]-1)<long((V[i,*]-mn[i])/bs[i])>0L)
> =>
> h=nbins[i]*h+(nbins[i]<long((V[i,*]-mn[i])/bs[i])>-1L)
>
>
>
> But since this function was written be JD and presented on Fanning's
> website, I obviously started doubting myself :-). Hence the question:
> is this a bug or a feature? And by changing these two lines, are there
> negative consequences which I overlooked?

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: hist_nd question By: Craig Markwardt on Wed, 07 March 2007 06:17
		Re: hist_nd question By: Wox on Tue, 06 March 2007 01:42
		Re: hist_nd question By: JD Smith on Mon, 05 March 2007 12:49
		Re: hist_nd question By: Kenneth Bowman on Mon, 05 March 2007 11:59
		Re: hist_nd question By: David Fanning on Mon, 05 March 2007 11:35
		Re: hist_nd question By: JD Smith on Mon, 05 March 2007 11:16
		Re: hist_nd question By: Wox on Mon, 05 March 2007 08:05
		Re: hist_nd question By: Wox on Mon, 05 March 2007 07:42

Previous Topic:	Checking for perl
Next Topic:	Re: Checking for perl

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 18 13:44:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.98486 seconds