comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Inaccuracies
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Inaccuracies [message #5294 is a reply to message #5290] Wed, 15 November 1995 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
wclodius is currently offline  wclodius
Messages: 3
Registered: November 1995
Junior Member
In article <48djg2$b85@post.gsfc.nasa.gov>,
thompson@orpheus.nascom.nasa.gov (William Thompson) wrote:

> <snip>
> ...Round-off errors are determined solely by the floating point
> processing done by the CPU. It was stated earlier, without testing, that IDL
> was deficient in this repect relative to Fortran or C--I showed in an earlier
> message that this was not the case.

Round off errors are the result of the algorithm, the process of
translating this algorithm into CPU and FPU operations, and FPU floating
point processing. For simple algorithms, as in the example that prompted
this thread, the translation of the algorithm for reasonable
implementations is liable to produce the same FPU processing. In such a
case you are correct. For more complicated algorithms, with optimizing
translations, that need not be the case.

--
William B. Clodius Phone (505) 665-9370
Los Alamos Natl. Lab. NIS-1 FAX (505) 665-7395
PO Box 1663, MS-D466 Group Office (505) 667-2701
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: How can I add parameter to curvefit?
Next Topic: XLoadCT in a procedure ?????

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:17:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00435 seconds