comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: the problem of PERROR in MPFITFUN

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: the problem of PERROR in MPFITFUN

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: the problem of PERROR in MPFITFUN [message #53076]

Thu, 15 March 2007 08:36

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

"duxiyu@gmail.com" <duxiyu@gmail.com> writes:

> In my work, independent variable X is time and measured dependent
> variable Y is magnetic field. The instrument do not give the measured
> error.
> Do I use 1 in MPFITFUN for errors of Y?
> Is the PERROR useless at this time?

Also, I recommend that you consult,
http://cow.physics.wisc.edu/~craigm/idl/mpfittut.html
and the citation to Bevington, Chapter 6.4.

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@REMOVEcow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: the problem of PERROR in MPFITFUN By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 15 March 2007 08:36
		Re: the problem of PERROR in MPFITFUN By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 15 March 2007 08:34
		Re: the problem of PERROR in MPFITFUN By: Vince Hradil on Thu, 15 March 2007 08:31
		Re: the problem of PERROR in MPFITFUN By: James Kuyper on Thu, 15 March 2007 07:44

Previous Topic:	change colors of IDL shell on OS X?
Next Topic:	Re: :_(x,y,z)_

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 11:35:49 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.04583 seconds