comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: idl segfaults in FC5

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: idl segfaults in FC5

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: idl segfaults in FC5 [message #53442 is a reply to message #53441]

Thu, 12 April 2007 14:04

news.verizon.net
Messages: 47
Registered: August 2003

Member

n Apr 12, 3:45 pm, Greg Hennessy <greg.henne...@localhost.localdomain>
wrote:
> As word to the wise, our entire department is unable to run tv
> commands with idl 6.2 without having it "segmentation fault" and
>
> Since I'm sure that if I report this to RSI I'll get told its a linux
> problem,

Hi Greg,

ITTVIS has asked ( http://www.ittvis.com/forum/message.asp?fmid=2848
that users with this problem report the values after running the
following 2 commands

X -version
$ glxinfo | grep "OpenGL renderer\|OpenGL vendor \|OpenGL version\|
direct"

as they try to debug the problem. --Wayne

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: George N. White III on Sun, 15 April 2007 05:49
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: Greg Hennessy on Fri, 13 April 2007 07:20
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: Greg Hennessy on Fri, 13 April 2007 07:10
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: Robbie on Thu, 12 April 2007 20:18
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: Greg Hennessy on Thu, 12 April 2007 17:23
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 April 2007 15:13
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: news.verizon.net on Thu, 12 April 2007 14:04
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: Greg Hennessy on Thu, 12 April 2007 13:35
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 April 2007 14:20
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: jkj on Mon, 16 April 2007 12:04
		Re: idl segfaults in FC5 By: jkj on Mon, 23 April 2007 14:52

Previous Topic:	surface vs. shade_surf
Next Topic:	Fixes For IDL/ENVI Seg Faults Due To Linux X11 & Mesa Library Upgrades

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:55:37 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36228 seconds