comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 [message #53543 is a reply to message #53540] Thu, 19 April 2007 11:15 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mmeron is currently offline  mmeron
Messages: 44
Registered: October 2003
Member
In article <MPG.20916bc4bfdc7a43989f4c@news.frii.com>, David Fanning <news@dfanning.com> writes:
> David Fanning writes:
>
>> I don't think there is anything "wrong" about your
>> assumption, except that it doesn't reflect reality.
>> This is how most of us go wrong with assumptions.
>> We assume something is so that ain't so. :-)
>
> Just to enlarge on this a bit, after poor typing
> skills, incorrect assumptions probably makes up
> the largest percentage of "bugs" in software. If
> you hear someone shouting "I don't f---ing
> believe this!", you can be almost certain an
> assumption is going to come crashing down.
>
> In general, there are better outcomes when our
> assumptions closely model reality than when they
> do not. In this particular case, if your assumption
> is "floating point math on computers can drive you
> crazy", then you are likely to make fewer mistakes
> than if your assumption is "computers always do
> what I expect them to do."
>
In other words, "an ounce of paranoia saves a pound of debugging".

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: sparsab, sparsax and complex arrays
Next Topic: Re: idl 6.1 crashes on linux

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:58:12 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.03822 seconds