comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Annoying ROIs

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Annoying ROIs [message #53576 is a reply to message #53491]

Wed, 18 April 2007 16:26

Robbie
Messages: 165
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

I never thought that annoying would ever be interpreted as such a
strong word, it was merely a play on words. It's more an itch, which
get worse with lower resolution images. I'm actually not saying that
IDL is wrong here, all I have really shown is how to offset IDLgrROI
by half a pixel in the same way that I would offset plots by half a
pixel.

Curiously, I'm supposed to be presenting an abstract next week in
which I have reported that I can copy ROIs from one Nuclear Medicine
scan to another with an average of 1 pixel accuracy. I wanted to make
sure I have this issue resolved before presenting.

P.S, For those who haven't realised, I'm babbling on about the
xcoord_conv=xscale and ycoord_conv=yscale keywords to object graphics.
Not the CONV_COORD function.

More riveting details available at

http://barnett.id.au/idl/annoying_rois/

Robbie

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Annoying ROIs By: Haje Korth on Wed, 18 April 2007 08:41
		Re: Annoying ROIs By: David Fanning on Wed, 18 April 2007 09:33
		Re: Annoying ROIs By: Paolo Grigis on Wed, 18 April 2007 08:20
		Re: Annoying ROIs By: David Fanning on Wed, 18 April 2007 08:20
		Re: Annoying ROIs By: David Fanning on Wed, 18 April 2007 08:10
		Re: Annoying ROIs By: Robbie on Wed, 18 April 2007 16:26

Previous Topic:	Re: loop limit ???
Next Topic:	Re: problem with writing a 2D image .tiff

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 09:20:36 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.48035 seconds