comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » fix(4.70*100) is... 469

Home » Public Forums » archive » fix(4.70*100) is... 469

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 [message #53618 is a reply to message #53578]

Fri, 20 April 2007 07:27

Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002

Senior Member

Qing wrote:
> On Apr 20, 3:44 am, b_efrem...@yahoo.com wrote:

> Lets continue the hunt... it may not be just fun. Is is possible that
> the difference between 469 and 470 could end up sending a satellite
> off its track :-((

Sure. Multiply either number by 1AU and the difference is not insignificant

> Really, I am serious! :-)))

Me too. But the fault would lie with the spacecraft system programmer, not the language
(be it IDL or something else).

Actually, the fault would lie with the programmers' supervisor/manager for a) assigning an
inexperienced person to produce the code and/or b) for not establishing useful QC/QA
processes that should catch these sorts of naive coding errors.

cheers,

paulv

--
Paul van Delst Ride lots.
CIMSS @ NOAA/NCEP/EMC Eddy Merckx

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: b_efremova@yahoo.com on Wed, 18 April 2007 15:48
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: mmeron on Fri, 20 April 2007 10:30
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: Bruce Bowler on Fri, 20 April 2007 09:47
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: James Kuyper on Fri, 20 April 2007 09:43
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: James Kuyper on Fri, 20 April 2007 09:31
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: James Kuyper on Fri, 20 April 2007 09:26
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Fri, 20 April 2007 07:27
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Thu, 19 April 2007 13:44
		Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 By: b_efremova@yahoo.com on Thu, 19 April 2007 12:43

Previous Topic:	idl 6.1 crashes on linux
Next Topic:	HDF5 data

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 17:36:40 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.71979 seconds