comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: surface vs. shade

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: surface vs. shade_surf

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: surface vs. shade_surf [message #53714 is a reply to message #53711]

Mon, 23 April 2007 20:45

Christopher Thom
Messages: 66
Registered: October 2006

Member

Quoth David Fanning:

> paulartcoelho@gmail.com writes:
>
>>
>> i'm having problems to compile fsc_surface (messages below). am i
>> missing something? (i never run any object graphics routine before)
>
> Oh, dear. Try this:
>
> http://www.dfanning.com/programs/fsc_surface.zip
>
> I sent you off for just one program, and you need several. Sorry.

I tried the example you suggested...and was very impressed with the cool
interactive twiddling of the surface. For a second I actually caught
myself thinking "maybe I should give up this direct graphics stuff and
check out these object thingies".

And then I had a reality check -- I reckon there's enough insanity getting
my code to display the same on X and postscript...:-)

cheers
chris

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: David Fanning on Tue, 24 April 2007 07:08
		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: paulartcoelho on Tue, 24 April 2007 04:34
		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: Christopher Thom on Mon, 23 April 2007 20:45
		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: David Fanning on Mon, 23 April 2007 16:07
		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: Rick Towler on Mon, 23 April 2007 14:57
		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: Jean H. on Mon, 23 April 2007 14:42
		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: paulartcoelho on Mon, 23 April 2007 14:28
		Re: surface vs. shade_surf By: David Fanning on Mon, 23 April 2007 12:54

Previous Topic:	Challenging question - array curve fitting
Next Topic:	saving arrays within loop

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 11:53:25 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08034 seconds