comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » crazy contour
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: crazy contour [message #53816 is a reply to message #53741] Wed, 02 May 2007 13:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
news.qwest.net is currently offline  news.qwest.net
Messages: 137
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
"Ed Hyer" <ejhyer@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178135490.340567.286010@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com.. .
> Bob,
>
> In my experience, 25MB, 50MB, 75MB, 130MB, right on up until a crash,
> when you use CONTOUR,/CELL_FILL in a PostScript context. I'm sure
> someone else could explain it better, but PostScript files have a
> raster resolution which is used internally by IDL, which is best
> described as "very, very high." I don't know how to determine the
> "effective raster resolution" that CONTOUR is using.
>
> When I have to do these plots, I make the contour plot using /
> CELL_FILL in the Z buffer, and then place it on the PS image. It would
> be nice if we could put some "pixel-size" magic into CONTOUR (like TV
> has), but I'm not aware of any solutions along those lines.
>
> --Edward H.

I will look into the z buffer approach (both you and David mentioned it)
the next time I come across a similar problem. The rotated shade_surf
works well too (for a scalable postscript file).

Thanks,
bob
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: contour over a map and 180 degrees off or problems with dateline
Next Topic: emacs-snapshot and IDLWAVE

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 00:08:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.27665 seconds