comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: keeping IDL !quiet

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: keeping IDL !quiet

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: keeping IDL !quiet [message #54685 is a reply to message #54573]

Wed, 27 June 2007 06:57

Vince Hradil
Messages: 574
Registered: December 1999

Senior Member

On Jun 25, 9:47 am, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> hradilv writes:
>> One could overload the print procudure, but I don't know how to
>> declare a procedure that takes multiple parameters. (BTW, can this be
>> done?)
>
> As far as I know, it is not possible to overload intrinsic
> IDL commands.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming:http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

True, I just tested it. Well I guess to avoid the situation I
mentioned, one could combine our solutions:
1- global replace of print with myPrint
2- write a myPrint procedure to do nothing.

Talk about minutae... (and anal-retentive) I gotta get back to work!

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: keeping IDL !quiet By: David Fanning on Mon, 25 June 2007 07:47
		Re: keeping IDL !quiet By: Vince Hradil on Mon, 25 June 2007 07:35
		Re: keeping IDL !quiet By: David Fanning on Fri, 22 June 2007 18:26
		Re: keeping IDL !quiet By: Vince Hradil on Wed, 27 June 2007 06:57

Previous Topic:	Segmentation fault: IDL Version 6.3 (linux x86 m32)+Debian SID
Next Topic:	boxplot

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:45:47 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87947 seconds