comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Seasonal Variation in Trend Analysis
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Seasonal Variation in Trend Analysis [message #56073 is a reply to message #56072] Thu, 27 September 2007 06:12 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Ingo von Borstel writes:

> I'd do a Fourier transform, filter out the terms that correspond to the
> seasonal frequency/ies and possibly do a back-transform.

Well, I can see this is what I *want* to do, but I
am still having some trouble with the *how* to do. :-)

For example, how, exactly, would I construct such
a filter. To knock out the first harmonic, would
I construct a circular filter near the origin? How
near? I take it from both your post and Bob's that
this is pretty much common knowledge, but if it is,
I must have been asleep in that class. The books I
have been using to understand regression and trend
analysis have not mentioned FFT filtering at all.
And although I think I have at least a limited grasp
of the theory, a practical understanding of the IDL
code to implement it still eludes me.

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: How to comment out large section of codes in IDL?
Next Topic: Unsolved indexing problem 2 weeks ago.

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 08:37:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.28202 seconds