comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » large info structure?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: large info structure? [message #56386 is a reply to message #56127] Wed, 24 October 2007 11:06 Go to previous message
R.Bauer is currently offline  R.Bauer
Messages: 1424
Registered: November 1998
Senior Member
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

markb77@gmail.com schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a widget application which will serve as a data analysis
> platform for scientific image data. The idea is that after loading
> the image, there are many different types of analysis that the user
> may wish to run on it, and this application will support them all.
> There will be an 'Analysis' dropdown menu, for instance, with several
> options. I also want to make it easy to add new analysis methods to
> the program.
>
> I've finished writing the front end and now I'm in the process of
> adding some analysis. What I'm noticing is that the info structure
> that gets passed around between event handlers is getting to be very
> large. Mine is up to 130 variables, at the moment.
>
> Does anyone have a strategy to suggest for dealing with this type of
> situation? I'm worried that this info data will spiral out of
> control. I was thinking that I could break down the info data into a
> bunch of smaller structures, and hold pointers to each of those
> structures in one higher level info structure..
>
> thanks,
> Mark
>

Hi

lots of comments already. I am not sure if you know uname and that you
can get quite everything back you added to widget elements. So the
question is why do you like to duplicate this data?

cheers
Reimar






-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHH4ma5aOc3Q9hk/kRAgxKAKCLR7KRJNXsL/46lxrN3Qt1xZFTSgCf U4xu
IvrwWeTiGfyvXczNSM1HSpw=
=f0F/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: weighted average for label_region
Next Topic: Recognizing double precision?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:09:11 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00670 seconds