comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: TNMIN limits
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: TNMIN limits [message #57177 is a reply to message #57087] Tue, 04 December 2007 09:15 Go to previous message
d.poreh is currently offline  d.poreh
Messages: 406
Registered: October 2007
Senior Member
On Dec 4, 3:56 pm, Brian Larsen <balar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Efficient is not the right word; when other methods work, amoeba is
>> almost always slower than those other methods. The great advantage of
>> amoeba isn't it's efficiency, but its reliability. It will work on
>> problems that most other methods can't handle.
>
> Right indeed.
>
> Another method to try is simulated annealing (aka traveling salesman)
> unfortunately I have never coded this up in IDL, I have used it in C
> several times to great success. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_annealing
>
> This method nearly always works but again is slower, but often that
> doesn't matter too much, all depended on how many times you have to do
> it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
> Brian Larsen
> Boston University
> Center for Space Physics

Hi Brian;
Would you please compare GA(genetic algorithm) with amoeba or SA
method? Which on is faster? Which one is reliable? Is in the amoeba
method any divergence problems exist like in GA or SA?
Cheers
Dave
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDL 6.4 seg-faults when drawing (Solaris-8)
Next Topic: TNMIN limits

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 22:53:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24012 seconds