comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Principal component analysis
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Principal component analysis [message #57323 is a reply to message #57151] Wed, 05 December 2007 08:51 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Haje Korth is currently offline  Haje Korth
Messages: 651
Registered: May 1997
Senior Member
yes, but the imsl routine had a finite third eigenvalue while PCOMP showed
this value as zero. That was difficult to understand. Vince came up with the
call that will produce the same result as pcomp:
IMSL_PRINC_COMP(CORRELATE(a)). Again, I am not quite sure I understand this.
Shouldn't the correlation analysis be part of the PCA?

"David Fanning" <news@dfanning.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21c07edf91c4354298a12d@news.frii.com...
> Haje Korth writes:
>
>> thanks for validating this. I tend to just go with PCOMP since I don't
>> really know what the IMSL routine actually does. As I wrote in the
>> response
>> to David I just got thrown off by not being able to reconcile the output
>> from the different routines.
>
> It looks to me like passing the CORRELATE results
> to EIGENQL just scales the eigenvalues into -1 to 1. That
> would seem to be a sensible choice to me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL7 Paths, again
Next Topic: Re: Custom formatting under version 7.0?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon Dec 01 20:54:51 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.27586 seconds