comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: On errors calculated by curve-fitting routines [message #59206 is a reply to message #59078] Thu, 06 March 2008 19:53 Go to previous message
Craig Markwardt is currently offline  Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996
Senior Member
Gernot Hassenpflug <gernot@nict.go.jp> writes:
> I find that in IDL the routines POLY_FIT, LMFIT and CURVEFIT can all
> calculate the parameter covariance matrix and it is documented that
> LMFIT uses the method of Burrell and Numerical Recipes. I cannot tell
> what method the other two routines use.

Anthony mentioned MPFIT, which is a non-linear fitting engine
translated from MINPACK. As far as I understand, the covariance
matrix is equivalent to that from Numerical recipes.

> I am hoping that contributors to this list could give their comments
> and opinions on what method of parameter variance and covariance is
> most sound, and which routines are therefore preferred for a
> polynomial fitting case (possibly over-determined).

For linear least squares, I think the covariance matrix is reasonably
useful. In my field, it's common to use the delta-chi-square method
described in Numerical Recipes, which usually involves making a
confidence grid for pairs of parameters that are of interest.

Craig
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Dimensions in NetCDF files created by IDL
Next Topic: Re: Dimensions in NetCDF files created by IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 06:09:39 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.76398 seconds