comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Does the ENVI_SVM

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Does the ENVI_SVM_DOIT function have memory leak problem?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Does the ENVI_SVM_DOIT function have memory leak problem? [message #59485 is a reply to message #59484]

Sun, 30 March 2008 03:56

Neve
Messages: 4
Registered: March 2008

Junior Member

On Mar 29, 12:34 am, Jean H <jghas...@DELTHIS.ucalgary.ANDTHIS.ca>
wrote:
> Do 1.0/numFeatures
>
> not sure it would have any effect on the memory though...
> you can try to add a heap_gc statement every now and then..
>
> Jean
>

Sorry, Jean. It seems that I replied to your email yesterday.

The "1.0/numFeatures" statement does not have effect on the memory. I
have checked that. I have also tried the heap_gc statement. It didn't
work. The problem still exists.
I used the "Heap_gc, /verbose" statement to see if there's still any
"garbage" in the memory after I removed the original image, the ROIs
and the classification result. But there was none. Yet some amount of
memory was occupied. It's really weird.

Anyway, thank you very much for you reply.

Neve

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Does the ENVI_SVM_DOIT function have memory leak problem? By: Neve on Sun, 30 March 2008 18:51
		Re: Does the ENVI_SVM_DOIT function have memory leak problem? By: Spon on Sun, 30 March 2008 06:22
		Re: Does the ENVI_SVM_DOIT function have memory leak problem? By: Neve on Sun, 30 March 2008 03:56
		Re: Does the ENVI_SVM_DOIT function have memory leak problem? By: Jean H. on Fri, 28 March 2008 09:34

Previous Topic:	Re: emacs, fedora 8, idlwave and IDL7
Next Topic:	How to use IDL to write a large geotiff

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Apr 26 18:12:11 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87853 seconds