comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Should we split this group? (was Re: Lift the "ban" :-))

Home » Public Forums » archive » Should we split this group? (was Re: Lift the "ban" :-))

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Should we split this group? (was Re: Lift the "ban" :-)) [message #5999 is a reply to message #5902]

Thu, 14 March 1996 00:00

peter
Messages: 80
Registered: February 1994

Member

Joseph M Zawodny (zawodny@arbd0.larc.nasa.gov) wrote:

: there is little reason to logically associate them with the same group.

: this (IDL) group has the
: knowledge base and can solve a large number of PV-WAVE problems/questions.

Which is it; they are not logically associated, or, the IDL group can
solve large numbers of PV-Wave problems?

As a former IDL, now PV-Wave, maybe future IDL user, I'd say it's a
ridiculous idea. About 95% of the questions are common to the two
languages, widgets being the only obvious exception.

: So what do you think?

Just say no.

Peter

--------------------------------
Peter Webb, HP Labs Medical Dept
E-Mail: peter_webb@hpl.hp.com
Phone: (415) 813-3756

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Should we split this group? (was Re: Lift the "ban" :-)) By: zawodny on Thu, 14 March 1996 00:00
		Re: Should we split this group? (was Re: Lift the "ban" :-)) By: Sergei Senin on Mon, 18 March 1996 00:00
		Re: Should we split this group? (was Re: Lift the "ban" :-)) By: Sergei Senin on Thu, 14 March 1996 00:00
		Re: Should we split this group? (was Re: Lift the "ban" :-)) By: peter on Thu, 14 March 1996 00:00

Previous Topic:	Widgets - 3.6 -> 4.0 Aaarrrggghhh!!
Next Topic:	wave routine -> GIF images

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 00:12:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.41916 seconds