comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » direct graphics or object graphics ?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: direct graphics or object graphics ? [message #60780 is a reply to message #60172] Sat, 14 June 2008 05:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Bill Triplett writes:

> On the machine I'm rendering on, this wouldn't be a problem except that
> IDL does not seem to relinquish that memory after the view has been
> rendered and the objects destroyed. Its only after the IDL process quits
> that the memory is recovered by the OS. This seems contrary to the way
> IDL manages its heap.

It is contrary to the way IDL manages its heap, but the
heap is already in process memory anyway. But not
relinquishing memory is standard operating procedure, as
far as I know, for any program written in C and using
malloc and free to allocate and free memory.

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: extract lat/lon from MOD13Q1
Next Topic: Hierarchical Splitting of images based on texture

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 08:20:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.38182 seconds