comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? [message #62705 is a reply to message #62704]

Tue, 23 September 2008 10:53

Jean H.
Messages: 472
Registered: July 2006

Senior Member

> Here's a way to get verts:
>
> sz = size(array)
> nx = sz[0]
> ny = sz[1]
> nz = sz[2]
> ns = sz[sz[0]+2]
> verts = findgen(ns)

Shouldn't it be indgen() ...
> verts = transpose([ [verts mod nx], [verts/nx mod ny], [verts/nx/
> ny] ])
>
> BTW, I'd like to find a faster way, if there is one.

what about this:
print, array_indices(arr, indgen(ns))

Jean

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: paulartcoelho on Wed, 24 September 2008 04:01
		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: Brian Larsen on Tue, 23 September 2008 13:26
		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: Vince Hradil on Tue, 23 September 2008 12:46
		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: Jean H. on Tue, 23 September 2008 10:53
		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: Brian Larsen on Tue, 23 September 2008 10:25
		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: Brian Larsen on Tue, 23 September 2008 10:15
		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: Vince Hradil on Tue, 23 September 2008 10:14
		Re: what is the best way to do a surface (or 2D) interpolation? By: Brian Larsen on Tue, 23 September 2008 09:54

Previous Topic:	Re: Getting array indices
Next Topic:	giving input to fortran program using spawn in IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 04:41:15 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.95734 seconds