comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Compute area between curves
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Compute area between curves [message #62876 is a reply to message #62821] Tue, 14 October 2008 04:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
jameskuyper is currently offline  jameskuyper
Messages: 79
Registered: October 2007
Member
mystea wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am also working on a topic where I need to numerically calculate an
> integral
> of a tabulated function. However, what I need is an indefinite
> integral, namely,
> the area under a curve as a function of x-coordinate.

You can't calculate the true indefinite integral using numerical
methods; that's something that can only be done by using a symbolic math
program like Mathematica.

> The procedure int_tabulated only calculates the definite integral,
> given tabulated
> f and its x-coordinates x. Let's say both f and x are double array of
> length nl.
>
> I tried the following fix:
>
> integral=dblarr(nl)
> for i=1, nl-1 do integral[i]=int_tabulated(x[0:i],f[0:i])

What you're getting by this method is not the indefinite integral, but a
tabulation of definite integrals. This can represent the indefinite
integral, in much the same sense that your x and f arrays represent the
function you want to integrate, but it is not the indefinite integral
itself.

> I thought it will work but not quite! Turns out that in general, the
> result
> integral will not be monotone even if f are always positive.

That should not be the case for the true integral of a function that is
always positive, assuming that the x values are sorted.

However, numerical integration always produces no better than an
approximation. INT_TABULATED uses a " a five-point Newton-Cotes
integration formula", which is basically derived from fitting those five
points to a polynomial. The best-fit polynomial could go to negative
values within the range of integration, even if all of the data it is
being fitted to is positive; in that case, the integral could decrease
with increasing x, for some values of x. That seems unlikely, however,
if your function is tabulated with sufficient detail.

Could you give a simple example that demonstrates the problem you've seen?
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Contour Issues... Help please
Next Topic: IDL User Group Meeting Huge Success: Correction

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 07:43:39 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40022 seconds