comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » On-the-fly compilation of routines
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: On-the-fly compilation of routines [message #63518 is a reply to message #63334] Fri, 07 November 2008 05:03 Go to previous message
R.Bauer is currently offline  R.Bauer
Messages: 1424
Registered: November 1998
Senior Member
David Fanning schrieb:
> Reimar Bauer writes:
>
>> Andrew Cool schrieb:
>>>> mean is a idl source function. You can open it by .edit mean on the idl input line.
>>> Well I'll be!!
>>>
>>> 17 years programming in IDL and I never knew this.
>>>
>>> What else don't I know? I'll go ask my wife - she'll tell me... ;-)
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>
>> Hi Andrew!
>>
>> On the other hand I know you know things I don't know, that's why I love
>> since several years this group.
>
> This reminds me of a discussion we had several weeks ago that
> I forgot to follow up on. Someone was trying to compile a large
> program project with a script that did a .COMPILE on his files.
> This worked fine in some earlier version of IDL, but had the
> effect of opening hundreds of edit windows in later versions.
>
> I happened to ask about this when I was around some ITTVIS types
> who were likely to know the answer. It turns out that .COMPILE
> is now the equivalent to the command sequence .RUN/.EDIT. And
> that what the person needed to do was replace all his .COMPILE
> commands with .RUN.
>
> This sort of turns the .COMPILE command back on its head,
> since I originally argued for it on the basis that no one
> outside of RSI could figure out why .RUN only compiled and
> didn't run anything, and that is why we needed a .COMPILE
> command.
>
> Anyway, I suppose when your institutional memory leaves the
> company, it's easy to forget why you did things originally. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David

indeed that is a stupid misbehaviour of idl 7.0 again. luckily it does
not crash the idl shell (because of a missing edit window).

In the past the .run dot command was used to compile and execute main
programs. There was no difference between the shell and the ide.

Now it behaves this way only if you don't use the ide :(


Reimar
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDL and Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex)
Next Topic: Re: array subtraction

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 17 23:52:16 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48122 seconds