comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Musing on IDL's Future Direction

Home » Public Forums » archive » Musing on IDL's Future Direction

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction [message #63706 is a reply to message #63650]

Tue, 18 November 2008 08:08

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Craig Markwardt writes:

> People apparently joke about me using old versions of IDL [*]. The
> truth is, when I have a version that works, I stick with it. Nothing
> frustrates me more than an application that wants to self-update
> itself every day.

I am *definitely* coming around to this way of thinking. ;-)

Cheers,

David

P.S. And let's just say the worst culprit is iTunes! 184 MBytes,
or whatever it is, about every three days. Enough!!

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Musing on IDL's Future Direction By: David Fanning on Sun, 16 November 2008 08:40
		Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 November 2008 08:08
		Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction By: Craig Markwardt on Tue, 18 November 2008 07:52
		Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction By: Mirko.Vukovic[1] on Tue, 18 November 2008 05:21
		Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction By: Craig Markwardt on Mon, 17 November 2008 21:18
		Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction By: Kenneth P. Bowman on Mon, 17 November 2008 07:22
		Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction By: pgrigis on Mon, 17 November 2008 07:57

Previous Topic:	reading slices of FITS files
Next Topic:	GPULib v1.0 is released

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 14:23:48 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.72218 seconds