comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Musing on IDL's Future Direction
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Musing on IDL's Future Direction [message #63717 is a reply to message #63650] Tue, 18 November 2008 05:21 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Mirko.Vukovic[1] is currently offline  Mirko.Vukovic[1]
Messages: 7
Registered: August 2007
Junior Member
On Nov 18, 12:18 am, Craig Markwardt <cbmarkwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 11:40 am, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
>
>> I guess my point is this. There are a lot of people,
>> myself included, who use and are extremely happy with
>> what I have come to think of as IDL's "old" features.
>> Line plots, image display, good ol' direct graphics,
>> sent to a PostScript file for nice output. We could
>> be made happy and a LOT less cynical, I think, if
>> along with the bright new gewgaws someone threw in a
>> lagniappe of a PostScript device that worked the way
>> it was suppose to work in this day and age.
>
> Yep, a better postscript driver would be nice.  Actually I was
> developing a new device driver to replace X/Postscript, but... it was
> hard!

I don't even upgrade my IDL. That is how exciting I find the new
releases.

But that may point to my age. Do the younger folks actually
appreciate the new features more?

Mirko
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: reading slices of FITS files
Next Topic: GPULib v1.0 is released

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 10:20:32 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.44322 seconds