comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Philosophical Question about NAN
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Philosophical Question about NAN [message #63796 is a reply to message #63672] Wed, 19 November 2008 16:24 Go to previous message
Mark[1] is currently offline  Mark[1]
Messages: 66
Registered: February 2008
Member
I think backward compatibility should be the overriding principle
here. So the NAN keyword defaults to unset and COMPILE_OPT IDL2
remains necessary for the new syntax. There's simply too much old code
around that shouldn't be broken unless absolutely necessary.

(Mind you, I pay very little attention to that with my own code, but
it's my code so I can do what I want!)
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: dependency tree / call graph in idl (cscope for idl)?
Next Topic: bake a cake

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 19:59:10 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55930 seconds