comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop [message #64668 is a reply to message #64594]

Fri, 09 January 2009 10:28

Jeremy Bailin
Messages: 618
Registered: April 2008

Senior Member

> Can't these last four lines be replaced by
> detHist = detHist<1
> acHist = acHist<1
>
> The < and > operators are useful though not necessarily intuitive.

For that matter, those operators are valid for the op= construction,
so you can write the very efficient (in both performance and typing
time):

detHist <= 1

but which will confuse the hell out of people who normally think in
most other languages where <= is a comparison. ;-)

-Jeremy.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop By: hldevil on Fri, 09 January 2009 00:46
		Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop By: hldevil on Thu, 08 January 2009 09:31
		Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop By: David Fanning on Thu, 08 January 2009 06:40
		Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop By: Tom McGlynn on Thu, 08 January 2009 06:36
		Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop By: Tom McGlynn on Thu, 08 January 2009 06:28
		Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop By: R.Bauer on Thu, 08 January 2009 05:54
		Re: Anyway to avoid this last for loop By: Jeremy Bailin on Fri, 09 January 2009 10:28

Previous Topic:	Compile/Restore on Startup
Next Topic:	How to write an array into a dateset as a band, not a dateset?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 15:28:41 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.64050 seconds