comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: "foreach" loops in IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: "foreach" loops in IDL [message #64797 is a reply to message #64795] Fri, 16 January 2009 12:34 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
pgrigis is currently offline  pgrigis
Messages: 436
Registered: September 2007
Senior Member
I was referring to foreach.pro , not to what you posted.
Sorry for the confusion.

I guess that I have the same loathing for common blocks that
David has for heap_gc ... I guess anybody is entitled his
quirks ;-)

Ciao,
Paolo

rtk wrote:
> On Jan 16, 12:37 pm, Paolo <pgri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My opinion is that something like that make the
>> code more difficult to understand and prevent
>> utilization in two different programs running at the
>> same time in the same session because of the
>> common blocks.
>
> It is unclear which set of extensions you are referring to, but if you
> mean the ones I mentioned I encourage you to take a second look at
> lambda.pro. There will be no problem between programs because of the
> common block. Also, the extensions are meant mostly for command line
> use.
>
> As for being hard to read and understand, that is just a matter of
> experience and opinion. Functional languages do pretty well with
> constructs like these and vastly more sophisticated ones.
>
> Lastly, as always, if you don't like something, don't use it :)
>
> Ron
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: ERRPLOT using object Graphics .... ?
Next Topic: Contour command

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 09:10:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24197 seconds