comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: "foreach" loops in IDL

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: "foreach" loops in IDL

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: "foreach" loops in IDL [message #64798 is a reply to message #64797]

Fri, 16 January 2009 12:18

rtk
Messages: 22
Registered: September 2008

Junior Member

On Jan 16, 12:37 pm, Paolo <pgri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My opinion is that something like that make the
> code more difficult to understand and prevent
> utilization in two different programs running at the
> same time in the same session because of the
> common blocks.

It is unclear which set of extensions you are referring to, but if you
mean the ones I mentioned I encourage you to take a second look at
lambda.pro. There will be no problem between programs because of the
common block. Also, the extensions are meant mostly for command line
use.

As for being hard to read and understand, that is just a matter of
experience and opinion. Functional languages do pretty well with
constructs like these and vastly more sophisticated ones.

Lastly, as always, if you don't like something, don't use it :)

Ron

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: R.Bauer on Mon, 19 January 2009 02:31
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: rtk on Fri, 16 January 2009 13:07
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: Vince Hradil on Fri, 16 January 2009 12:43
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: pgrigis on Fri, 16 January 2009 12:34
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: rtk on Fri, 16 January 2009 12:18
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: pgrigis on Fri, 16 January 2009 11:37
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: rtk on Fri, 16 January 2009 10:54
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: JD Smith on Tue, 20 January 2009 13:11
		Re: "foreach" loops in IDL By: alaniwiusenet on Sat, 31 January 2009 04:20

Previous Topic:	Re: ERRPLOT using object Graphics .... ?
Next Topic:	Contour command

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:20:10 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00491 seconds