comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Can this be done using array operations instead?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Can this be done using array operations instead?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? [message #66116 is a reply to message #65921]

Thu, 02 April 2009 09:26

robintw
Messages: 37
Registered: March 2009

Member

Thanks for the response.

I'm trying to perform a function on each 3x3 square which calculates
something called a Getis statistic - which involves calculating a
formula which needs the sum of the values in 3x3 square, their mean,
variance etc.

Is there a way to call a generic user-defined function on each value
in an array - so I can have a function Getis which can be called on
each value to create a new output array?

Cheers,

Robin

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Can this be done using array operations instead? By: robintw on Thu, 02 April 2009 07:34
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: Jeremy Bailin on Thu, 02 April 2009 14:11
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: robintw on Thu, 02 April 2009 12:43
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: robintw on Thu, 02 April 2009 11:58
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: Jean H. on Thu, 02 April 2009 11:39
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: robintw on Thu, 02 April 2009 10:38
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: Allan Whiteford on Thu, 02 April 2009 10:16
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: robintw on Thu, 02 April 2009 09:26
		Re: Can this be done using array operations instead? By: Juggernaut on Thu, 02 April 2009 08:58

Previous Topic:	Re: simultaneous use of multiple font on a postscript file
Next Topic:	Re: highlight text in text widget

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:30:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00227 seconds