comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » yet another idl memory question

Home » Public Forums » archive » yet another idl memory question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: yet another idl memory question [message #66748 is a reply to message #66699]

Wed, 10 June 2009 14:15

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

David Fanning writes:

> If you like, you can think of a pointer as a type of
> IDL variable that doesn't currently work with UNDEFINE. :-)

UNDEFINE has now been updated to recursively search
pointers, objects, and structure variables for other
variables it can destroy and devour before it gets
around to undefining the variable in question.

Even Paolo should be satisfied now. :-)

http://www.dfanning.com/programs/undefine.pro

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		yet another idl memory question By: jw2519 on Thu, 04 June 2009 08:53
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: pgrigis on Wed, 10 June 2009 15:01
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: David Fanning on Wed, 10 June 2009 14:15
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: JDS on Mon, 15 June 2009 11:57
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: David Fanning on Mon, 08 June 2009 13:09
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: pgrigis on Mon, 08 June 2009 12:57
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: ben.bighair on Mon, 15 June 2009 12:07
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: pgrigis on Mon, 08 June 2009 12:56
		Re: yet another idl memory question By: David Fanning on Mon, 08 June 2009 12:05

Previous Topic:	Re: 4 byte integers
Next Topic:	idl encoder/decoder of json

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 04:11:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.13482 seconds