comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Confusions with map_image!
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Confusions with map_image! [message #66970 is a reply to message #66858] Fri, 12 June 2009 17:49 Go to previous message
jameskuyper is currently offline  jameskuyper
Messages: 79
Registered: October 2007
Member
David Fanning wrote:
...
> MAP_IMAGE is really a *display* technique (and a
> poor one at that). It would probably be much better
> to fit a map coordinate system to your image, rather
> than fit the image to your coordinate system.

It sounds like the original data he's using are MODIS L2 products, in
which case the the most appropriate coordinate system to use for any
given orbit's worth of data would be virtually any cylindrical
projection with it's axis tilted so that the "equator" of the projection
corresponds roughly to the ground path of the satellite (it can't be an
exact fit). However, he's interested in an entire day's worth of data
covering (incompletely) the entire globe. No single projection is going
to be a good fit for all of the orbits of an entire day's worth of data.
I think he's stuck with fitting his data to his coordinate system, and
not vice versa.

MODIS data, because of the high inclination of it's orbit, heavily
over-samples the polar regions. About the only thing he could do to
adapt his projection to the data is to choose one that exaggerates the
size of the polar regions; but that would only make sense if he's
actually interested in the polar regions.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Checking version number
Next Topic: Confusions with map_image!

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 17:27:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.56216 seconds