comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: SIZE() vs. N

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS()

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() [message #67321 is a reply to message #67249]

Thu, 16 July 2009 13:25

wlandsman
Messages: 743
Registered: June 2000

Senior Member

> Yes, but which is *correct*? :-)

As usual, what is correct depends on the question you are asking.
There is one ASSOC variable, but it is mapped to a structure with 2
elements.

I presume the Prize Chairman will spend his time under the Carribbean
Sun pondering this conundrum. Have fun!

--Wayne

> Tough competition this month though, in the form of Scope_VarFetch
> and Execute as suggestions to the poor guy who wanted
> to know what an array was.

To be fair, it wasn't clear to me from the original question whether
it was from a beginner or not. I know in the past that I have made
the opposite mistake of answering a question from an expert with an
explanation for a beginner...

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: Craig Markwardt on Sat, 18 July 2009 02:40
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: wlandsman on Thu, 16 July 2009 13:25
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: David Fanning on Thu, 16 July 2009 13:11
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: David Fanning on Thu, 16 July 2009 13:04
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: wlandsman on Thu, 16 July 2009 12:59

Previous Topic:	Best form factor for a NetCDF package of a dataset
Next Topic:	Re: Linear fit with user defined weights

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 16:02:10 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87844 seconds