comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL, PV-Wave, Matlab, Khoros
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL, PV-Wave, Matlab, Khoros [message #675 is a reply to message #673] Tue, 19 January 1993 13:49 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
thompson is currently offline  thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
Senior Member
In article <1993Jan19.175815.8722@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>, kevin@dipl.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes...
> alan@elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Alan S. Mazer) writes:
>
>> Can someone tell me how these packages might compare in an image analysis
>> environment? What I really need is a nice front end that can do plots and
>> simple image manipulation and interface easily with a lot of custom C code.
>
> I don't know about IDL or Khoros, but:
>
> PV Wave is primarily a graphics package that has math functions
> on the side.

IDL and PV Wave are very similar products having a common ancestor (an older
version of IDL). The above description could apply equally well to IDL.

> Matlab is primarily a math package (or more precisely a matrix math
> package) that has graphics functions on the side.
>
> Not suprisingly, Wave is better at graphics and Matlab is better at
> math. Both packages have C interfaces, but the C interface to matlab
> is easier than the one to Wave

I don't know about PV-Wave, but IDL's C interface is *very* easy to use, IMHO.
I think that this feature is one of those that is *not* identical between the
two packages, but can't be positive.

Bill Thompson
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Creating LP Filters
Next Topic: PV-Wave X output directed into another X Application

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 00:43:26 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.84268 seconds