comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: C-->IDL / FORTRAN-->IDL searched
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: C-->IDL / FORTRAN-->IDL searched [message #6769 is a reply to message #6761] Wed, 14 August 1996 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Tim Patterson is currently offline  Tim Patterson
Messages: 65
Registered: October 1995
Member
Stein Vidar (UiO) wrote:
>
> In article <32106E36.11DF863A@phim.unibe.ch>, Simon Hefti <hefti@phim.unibe.ch> writes:
> |> Hi,
> |>
> |> has anyone written a C to IDL and/or FORTRAN to IDL converter
> |> similar to p2c or f2c ?
> |>
> |> If not I think this might be a very nice tool to have ...
>
> Indeed, but I wouldn't spend much time searching for one,
> it's quite unlikely that any such creature exists.
> Going from a "low-level" to a "high-level" language is not
> an easy task to do automatically -- it's just about impossible.
> Going the other way, from IDL->C or IDL->FORTRAN is feasible,
> though, but I haven't heard about any program that actually does
> it.
>
> Stein Vidar

Going from C -> IDL might be impossible unles somebody wanted
to handle pointers anbd pinters to pointers etc.
But Fortran -> IDL should be easier. At least, i can think of
anything in F77 that can't be done in IDL. Optimizing the
IDL code would be the hard part if you wanted to make an efficient
translation.

Tim
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: labeling time series with dates
Next Topic: Multiple plots on a page (was: Color PS (was:IDL resources))

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 22:37:44 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87868 seconds