comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Saved Object Question

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Saved Object Question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Saved Object Question [message #67768 is a reply to message #67621]

Thu, 20 August 2009 15:57

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

pp writes:

> It feels slow to me, too. Also, not much point in keep testing to
> avoid doing things when catch can do both the test and the intended
> operation, and thus might look nicer (if made GOTO-less).
>
> Since call_procedure will do the same search that file_which would,
> using file_which first would mean search twice in the cases the file
> is found. But no disk searches would be done using the help output,
> just a quick string array search.

Well, I might have to code it up and see which is
faster on a day when I'd rather write IDL code than
play tennis. In the meantime, it works, appears
reasonably fast, and is something ugly I can point
to when my grandchildren (some day!) ask me if I
ever wrote ugly IDL code. ;-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming (www.dfanning.com)
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Saved Object Question By: penteado on Thu, 20 August 2009 15:26
		Re: Saved Object Question By: David Fanning on Thu, 20 August 2009 15:03
		Re: Saved Object Question By: penteado on Thu, 20 August 2009 14:25
		Re: Saved Object Question By: David Fanning on Thu, 20 August 2009 13:52
		Re: Saved Object Question By: penteado on Wed, 19 August 2009 20:27
		Re: Saved Object Question By: David Fanning on Thu, 20 August 2009 15:57

Previous Topic:	Re: is-it possible to extract multiple profiles on multiple images from shape files
Next Topic:	Yet another build script

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 22:41:39 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.44301 seconds