comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: progressbar update problem

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: progressbar update problem

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: progressbar update problem [message #68373 is a reply to message #68370]

Thu, 29 October 2009 10:02

lbusett@yahoo.it
Messages: 30
Registered: February 2006

Member

Hi David,

thanks for your suggestion ! I took a look at the IDL_IDLBRIDGE,
and it seemed promising.
However, while reading the documentation and some posts in the
newsgroup I found out that the Bridge can not be used in the virtual
machine, since the EXECUTE method doesn't work.

Since I plan to share the application with the VM, I then think that I
can not use this solution.

Any other ideas ?

Lorenzo

>
> I wonder if the IDL Bridge would help in this situation?
> (IDL_IDLBridge object). The idea would be to run the progress
> bar in a separate IDL process. I really have no idea if you
> could communicate with the ProgressBar object over the bridge
> in this way. But since it would be running in a separate IDL
> process, it might solve the "update" problem. On the other
> hand, it might also cause a world of problems on its own, so...
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming:http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: progressbar update problem By: rdh on Thu, 29 October 2009 12:42
		Re: progressbar update problem By: lbusett@yahoo.it on Thu, 29 October 2009 10:02
		Re: progressbar update problem By: David Fanning on Thu, 29 October 2009 05:40
		Re: progressbar update problem By: Andrew Cool on Mon, 02 November 2009 14:36

Previous Topic:	widget_button on a IDLgrWindow in WINDOWS / UNIX
Next Topic:	writing large 3D data file fails

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 19:35:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.75228 seconds