comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Invalid indices?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Invalid indices? [message #68390 is a reply to message #68384] Wed, 28 October 2009 16:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Brian Larsen is currently offline  Brian Larsen
Messages: 270
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
There are quite a few compile options out there, some I use normally
and some I don't. THis second I am worrying about execution speed
differences for compile options.

I am tempted to use strictarrsubs and strictarr in all my codes,
anyone have any thoughts on if there is a speed difference with any
compile options? I will do a test also but I'm curious of others
thoughts and experiences.

Using this simple code I see:
PRO run_test
a1 = findgen(1000)
a2 = findgen(1000)
t0 = systime(/sec)
FOR i = 0UL, 1000 DO BEGIN
s3 = a1#a2
ENDFOR
print, systime(/sec)-t0
END

no compile_opt: 7.9020839
compile_opt strictarr: 7.9031930
compile_opt strictarr, strictarrsubs: 7.8117480

So I see no slowdown, maybe even a speedup...




Cheers,

Brian

------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Brian Larsen
Boston University
Center for Space Physics
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: What is the problem ?
Next Topic: Fractal in IDL!

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 20:38:47 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.27799 seconds