comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » _extra keyword
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: _EXTRA KEYWORD [message #68628 is a reply to message #43326] Wed, 11 November 2009 14:47 Go to previous message
mankoff is currently offline  mankoff
Messages: 131
Registered: March 2004
Senior Member
On Nov 9, 1:09 am, Reimar Bauer <R.Ba...@fz-juelich.de> wrote:
> dandan schrieb:
>
>> Hi, everyone,
>> Dose _EXTRA pass the keywords from the caller to called routine or the
>> opposite?
>
> You may be also interested into the _REF_EXTRA keyword.
>
> The presence of a name in the _REF_EXTRA value indicates that a keyword
> of that name was passed, and its value is available to be passed on in a
> function or procedure call (using either _EXTRA or _STRICT_EXTRA).
>
> cheers
> Reimar

I still have not entirely wrapped my head around _EXTRA, _REF_EXTRA,
and _STRICT_EXTRA despite numerous readings of discussions on this
group about these keywords.

Does anyone have a graphical explanation of these? A flow-chart with
arrows and diamonds and YES/NO keywords perhaps? I have a feeling that
would get the concept across. If not, perhaps I'll take what I do
understand of these keywords and try to create such a chart.

-k.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Tough System Variable Question for the IDL Gurus
Next Topic: DICOM write: invalid character for this VR

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:18:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00443 seconds