comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: reading an ascii file efficiently

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: reading an ascii file efficiently

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: reading an ascii file efficiently [message #68899 is a reply to message #68895]

Sat, 28 November 2009 11:00

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

pp writes:

> Thanks. So I was not the only one to be fooled by strmid and its
> documentation.

No, not at all. You are in EXTREMELY good company. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: jeanh on Mon, 30 November 2009 06:50
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: natha on Mon, 30 November 2009 06:39
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: David Fanning on Sat, 28 November 2009 11:00
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: penteado on Fri, 27 November 2009 21:04
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: David Fanning on Fri, 27 November 2009 20:56
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: penteado on Fri, 27 November 2009 19:58
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: Heinz Stege on Fri, 27 November 2009 19:27
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: Heinz Stege on Fri, 27 November 2009 19:16
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: penteado on Fri, 27 November 2009 14:45
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: natha on Fri, 27 November 2009 11:02
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: jeanh on Fri, 27 November 2009 10:39
		Re: reading an ascii file efficiently By: b_gom on Fri, 27 November 2009 10:34

Previous Topic:	Re: Larger arrays or more dimensions?
Next Topic:	SHAPEFILE changes in IDL7.1?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 17:37:18 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.23803 seconds