comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado
Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL 8.0 compile_opt changes
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend  		Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL 8.0 compile_opt changes [message #69178 is a reply to message #69177] Sat, 19 December 2009 08:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
M. Katz is currently offline  M. Katz
Messages: 69
Registered: May 2005
Member
I have 400,000 lines of code in my libraries. Maybe 100,000 is
"active." I would avoid upgrading to avoid having to convert every old
() to [] in code I wrote years ago but still rely on. I favor the .pro
and .prx split as an elegant solution for seamless recognition of
compile options, that preserves the function of old code with the
least amount of work. If there are .pro and .prx routines with the
same name, the compiler could choose the .prx by default, or have a
preference setting that allows an override.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Coyote Contributions
Next Topic: Re: how to read/display an image like it's done in ENVI?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:33:59 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00479 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.7.
Copyright ©2001-2013 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software