comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » For-loop vs. Dimensional Juggling relative performance

Home » Public Forums » archive » For-loop vs. Dimensional Juggling relative performance

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: For-loop vs. Dimensional Juggling relative performance [message #69781 is a reply to message #69745]

Fri, 12 February 2010 16:55

MarioIncandenza
Messages: 231
Registered: February 2005

Senior Member

On Feb 12, 9:01 am, Ed Hyer <ejh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 9:22 am, Gray <grayliketheco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oy... wish I'd known about match_2d before I spent so much time on
>> mine. Yes, it kicks both routines' collective butt.
>
> I, also, have spent much time writing code to do what MATCH_2D does. I
> have to remember to check those webpages periodically, as my needs
> change...

So, today I swapped in a MATCH_2D solution in exchange for some
homebrew hack. I only got about a 400% speedup out of it... :)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		For-loop vs. Dimensional Juggling relative performance By: Gray on Mon, 08 February 2010 20:26
		Re: For-loop vs. Dimensional Juggling relative performance By: MarioIncandenza on Fri, 12 February 2010 16:55
		Re: For-loop vs. Dimensional Juggling relative performance By: MarioIncandenza on Fri, 12 February 2010 09:01
		Re: For-loop vs. Dimensional Juggling relative performance By: Gray on Thu, 11 February 2010 09:22

Previous Topic:	Re: How I can access the convolve data?
Next Topic:	Editing Shapefile

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 03:44:38 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08468 seconds