comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Image error calculation
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Image error calculation [message #70285 is a reply to message #70283] Wed, 31 March 2010 20:07 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Suguru Amakubo is currently offline  Suguru Amakubo
Messages: 24
Registered: March 2010
Junior Member
Sorry about that, what I will consider to be a better quality image is
that the details of the structures (DNA) could be identified better.

So in a nutshell if I see the new image and see more details that was
previously unidentifiable (due to partial bluring) that I consider to
be a better image. A 'sharper' image will probably best describe it.
However the problem lies in quantifying it. (Since saying this image
looks better just won't do. It needs to be: e.g. x % better than the
original image).

As for the how I made the image, I basically used one image as a
'base' and the took 22 different images of the same DNA that was taken
immediately after each other and then split the new image into smaller
subset images and mathematically found a point that is considered to
be similar and placed it on top of it (then divided to get the end
image).

My aim therefore is to compare the base image with the new image and
determine quantitatively by what degree the image has improved.

Sorry about the lack of explanation. Please tell me if the above needs
explaining further.

Suguru
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: how many array elements with a certain value in a row
Next Topic: Vectorized great circle calculations

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:57:08 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00467 seconds