comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Comments on Coding Style
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Comments on Coding Style [message #70670 is a reply to message #70669] Thu, 29 April 2010 13:17 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Aram Panasenco is currently offline  Aram Panasenco
Messages: 41
Registered: April 2010
Member
pp wrote:
> On Apr 29, 4:26 pm, Aram Panasenco<panasencoa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am going to try and use only one header per class that will describe
>> the entire class interface. I am using non-standard tags (Name, Design
>> Details, Abstraction, Syntax, and Public Methods) instead of the more
>> standard (Name, Purpose, Category, Superclasses, Subclasses, Syntax). Is
>> that a bad change? What would you like to see different about the header?
>
> If you use one of the standard formats (and tags) for the comments,
> then you can use IDLdoc to generate nice documentation pages (which
> include very useful features like links and search). If you are not
> familiar with it, see
>
> http://idldoc.idldev.com/
>
> Also, using one of the standard formats allows the Workbench to show
> the help for the routine.

Actually, I have just explored more of IDLdoc and I think it has some
pretty good standards. Maybe I will switch to documenting each routine
by them. I will see. Thanks again for the info!

~Aram Panasenco
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: AO, SAO
Next Topic: Writing *.csv files

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:25:12 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00457 seconds