comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: dealing with arguments

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: dealing with arguments

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: dealing with arguments [message #71267 is a reply to message #71118]

Wed, 02 June 2010 15:17

fgg
Messages: 67
Registered: April 2010

Member

On Jun 2, 3:12 pm, pp <pp.pente...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Use keywords instead of positional arguments:
>
> pro name, mode, s1=s1, s2=s2
>
> That way, when calling the routine you can use any order, or omit any
> argument, and they still get associated to the right variables. Also
> consider replacing s1 and s2 by more descriptive names, to make it
> easier for users to know what the arguments mean. With keywords, you
> can still use the short names inside your routine:
>
> pro name, mode, some_argument_name_1=s1, some_other_argument=s2

Thank you, pp. So if mode=2 and I want to make s2=100 then all I need
is:

proname, 2, s2=100 ?

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: dealing with arguments By: penteado on Wed, 02 June 2010 15:12
		Re: dealing with arguments By: fgg on Wed, 02 June 2010 15:17

Previous Topic:	Re: FOR loop ends one above where it's supposed to
Next Topic:	dealing with arguments

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 06:27:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.96009 seconds