Re: Another small V8.0 bug [message #71876 is a reply to message #71872] |
Mon, 26 July 2010 14:53   |
Chris[6]
Messages: 84 Registered: July 2008
|
Member |
|
|
On Jul 26, 9:31 am, Craig Markwardt <craig.markwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2:15 pm, wlandsman <wlands...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 26, 1:59 pm, Paulo Penteado <pp.pente...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Do you mean that this does not happen every time? To me this seems to
>>> be the expected behavior. The line
>
>>> print,list(0)
>
>>> Is creating a list (which is an object), containing one element, and
>>> printing it. The same with the use of help.
>
>> OK, I did not know that list() was a new intrinsic function,
>> thanks. But since "list" is my most used variable name, V8.0 is not
>> backwards compatibile.
>
> Wow, through sheer luck, I've never used an array variable named
> LIST[]. I have mixed feelings about introducing such a potentially-
> incompatible change into IDL.
>
> Craig
Note that this doesn't seem specific to list -- in IDL 8, any object
(user written or otherwise) can now be created with the command
x = object_name(args)
as well as
x = obj_new('object_name', args)
chris
|
|
|