comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Another small V8.0 bug

Home » Public Forums » archive » Another small V8.0 bug

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Another small V8.0 bug [message #71920 is a reply to message #71892]

Thu, 29 July 2010 08:26

wlandsman
Messages: 743
Registered: June 2000

Senior Member

On Jul 28, 5:53 pm, JD Smith <jdtsmith.nos...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Haven't managed to download 8 yet, but people should also be aware of
> the increased potential for namespace conflict (and parentheses
> indexing variable/function confusion) arising from the new syntax for
> object instantiation. I.e. if you have any functions (or
> parenthetically indexed variable in the same scope) of the same name
> as an object class, you will get new conflicts. This "list" is just
> an example of that.

Anyone know if there is a way to list all the object instantiation
functions (intrinsic or otherwise) that IDL knows about? I was a
bit surprised to find that ROUTINE_INFO(/SYSTEM,/FUNCTION) does not
include the list() function. --Wayne

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Another small V8.0 bug By: wlandsman on Mon, 26 July 2010 10:12
		Re: Another small V8.0 bug By: wlandsman on Thu, 29 July 2010 11:35
		Re: Another small V8.0 bug By: penteado on Thu, 29 July 2010 10:43
		Re: Another small V8.0 bug By: wlandsman on Thu, 29 July 2010 08:26

Previous Topic:	Re: Do we need PTR_FREE anymore?
Next Topic:	NSIDC Looking for Science Programmers

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 19:43:59 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01326 seconds