comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDLDoc Bandwagon
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDLDoc Bandwagon [message #72654 is a reply to message #72510] Mon, 20 September 2010 21:23 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
penteado is currently offline  penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018
Senior Member
Administrator
On Sep 21, 1:16 am, Paulo Penteado <pp.pente...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 12:54 am, Michael Galloy <mgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's painful to convert existing files, so individual files can specify
>> their own FORMAT_STYLE/MARKUP_STYLE by putting a "docformat" comment on
>> the *first line* of the file, like:
>
>> ; docformat = 'rst rst'
>
>> or
>
>> ; docformat = 'IDL preformatted'
>
> I had not noticed that the markup style could fix the newlines for old
> comments.
>
> What I have  been using, to make the old files work unaltered, is to
> specify fortmat_style='IDL' in the call to IDLDoc, and always put the
> docformat on the new files, to override the IDL format.

By the way, I noticed that using fortmat_style='IDL' in the IDLDoc
call seems to supress the contents of the overview file. Is this
intended?
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: The variable shellCmd is not defined
Next Topic: Coyote and Catalyst Libraries Available on SVN Repository

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 14:38:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.71978 seconds