comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: alternative to execute available?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: alternative to execute available?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: alternative to execute available? [message #72883 is a reply to message #72880]

Wed, 13 October 2010 07:22

Foldy Lajos
Messages: 268
Registered: October 2001

Senior Member

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, chris wrote:

> Hi there,
> I'm often using the _extra keyword in my routines together with a
> simple approach to give variables values, like this one
>
> pro test_ex, _extra=ex
> for i=0l,n_tags(ex)-1l do _=execute((tag_names(ex))[i]+'=ex.(i)')
> end
>
> If I would call this like: test,/hello,d=dist(10)
> it would give me within the pro: d with the value dist(10) and hello
> with the value 1
>
> It works fine, but has one big limitation. I cannot use this technique
> if I would like to produce working binaries (sav-files). Is there any
> way to avoid the execute call without having information which
> keywords were passed to the test_ex routine?
>
> Thanks and regards
>
> CR

for i=0l,n_tags(ex)-1l do (scope_varfetch((tag_names(ex))[i], /enter))=ex.(i)

regards,
lajos

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: alternative to execute available? By: David Fanning on Wed, 13 October 2010 08:05
		Re: alternative to execute available? By: rogass on Wed, 13 October 2010 08:00
		Re: alternative to execute available? By: Foldy Lajos on Wed, 13 October 2010 07:22

Previous Topic:	Official "release" of Coyote and Catalyst Libraries
Next Topic:	Re: Official "release" of Coyote and Catalyst Libraries

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 04:38:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.88032 seconds