comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given [message #72895 is a reply to message #72894]

Tue, 12 October 2010 15:25

penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018

Senior Member
Administrator

On Oct 12, 7:16 pm, Paul van Delst <paul.vande...@noaa.gov> wrote:
>> Not showing the full trace is consistent with returning to the caller.
>
> <disclaimer>
> I do not use ON_ERROR for error handling. I always use CATCH.
> </disclaimer>
>
> Not sure if I agree with the consistency you mention. Since the error handler prints out a message it should at least
> provide the name of the procedure/function in which the error occurred. Without it, there is zero context >for the error.

My view is that setting 2 for on_error is already asking to be thrown
out of the context of the error. That is why I see it as consistent.
It is not zero information on where the error happens, because you get
the trace up to the point where the routine with 'on_error,2' is
called.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Wed, 13 October 2010 14:33
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Wed, 13 October 2010 14:10
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Wed, 13 October 2010 14:08
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Wed, 13 October 2010 13:53
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Wed, 13 October 2010 11:35
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Wed, 13 October 2010 11:33
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Wed, 13 October 2010 10:47
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Wed, 13 October 2010 10:06
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Wed, 13 October 2010 09:46
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Wed, 13 October 2010 08:03
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Wed, 13 October 2010 07:50
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Wed, 13 October 2010 05:43
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Tue, 12 October 2010 21:55
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Tue, 12 October 2010 21:38
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: wlandsman on Tue, 12 October 2010 20:34
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Tue, 12 October 2010 20:02
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Tue, 12 October 2010 19:46
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: wlandsman on Tue, 12 October 2010 19:42
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Tue, 12 October 2010 15:51
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Tue, 12 October 2010 15:25
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Tue, 12 October 2010 15:16
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: Bill Nel on Tue, 12 October 2010 14:49
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Tue, 12 October 2010 13:54
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Tue, 12 October 2010 12:58
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Tue, 12 October 2010 12:45
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: penteado on Tue, 12 October 2010 11:11
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: David Fanning on Tue, 12 October 2010 11:00
		Re: IDL 8.0 bug -- line number of errors not given By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Wed, 13 October 2010 15:07

Previous Topic:	Re: execute an idl procedure without seeing idl workbench
Next Topic:	convenient graphical object syntax

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 05:26:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.90282 seconds