comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » the "real" screen size
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: the "real" screen size [message #73153 is a reply to message #73042] Mon, 25 October 2010 10:32 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michael Galloy is currently offline  Michael Galloy
Messages: 1114
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
On 10/25/10 10:15 AM, David Fanning wrote:
> David Fanning writes:
>
>> Why can't you use a pixmap?
>
> Oh, never mind. I see. Darn, I hate flashing
> windows about as much as I hate anything. :-(
>
> Nothing speaks "non-commercial" more than these
> kinds of solutions.
>
> Are the LINUX and Mac numbers all over the board,
> or could you do a reasonable "guess" and just
> incorporate those into our ever-present fudge
> factors?

The EXCLUDE_TASKBAR is ignored on Macs, BUT it always returns the size
*without* the menu bar (basically its the equivalent of
EXCLUDE_TASKBAR=1 always):

For my work monitor (Mac OS X, 1680 x 1050), I get:

IDL> print, getPrimaryScreenSize()
1680 1028
IDL> print, getPrimaryScreenSize(/exclude)
1680 1028

This seems consistent from my home laptop: the menu bar is 22 pixels tall.

Mike
--
www.michaelgalloy.com
Research Mathematician
Tech-X Corporation
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: POLY_2D and anti-aliasing
Next Topic: Re: Z-Graphics Buffer Resolution

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 18 22:18:09 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.52027 seconds