comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: an idl

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0? [message #73279 is a reply to message #73278]

Wed, 03 November 2010 17:31

penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018

Senior Member
Administrator

On Nov 3, 4:17 pm, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> They are trying to sort out the problem now, but there
> is some thought to going back to a separated workbench/process
> arrangement for Windows computers. All of this is still
> to be determined, but the folks at ITTVIS understand that
> the current arrangement is not ideal.

Is this not the bug that was fixed in 8.0.1:

"58077 59612 IDL cannot allocate sufficient memory for large arrays."

?

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0? By: Mark[1] on Wed, 03 November 2010 22:46
		Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0? By: David Fanning on Wed, 03 November 2010 17:49
		Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0? By: penteado on Wed, 03 November 2010 17:31
		Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0? By: David Fanning on Wed, 03 November 2010 11:17
		Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0? By: Doug Martin on Wed, 03 November 2010 11:09
		Re: an idl_opserver-like option for IDL 8.0? By: David Fanning on Wed, 03 November 2010 10:29

Previous Topic:	Re: IDL function to get area cover of polygon
Next Topic:	Re: capture astronomy IDL's library stderr into a file

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:48:18 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.15575 seconds